Search for: All records

Greenhouse gas emissions from the residential sector represent a large fraction of global emissions and must be significantly curtailed to achieve ambitious climate goals. To stimulate the adoption of relevant technologies such as rooftop PV and heat pumps, governments and utilities have designedincentivesthat encourage adoption of decarbonization technologies. However, studies have shown that many of these incentives are inefficient since a substantial fraction of spending does not actually promote adoption. Further, these incentives are not equitably distributed across socioeconomic groups. In this article, we present a novel data-driven approach that adopts a holistic, emissions-based, and city-scale perspective on decarbonization. We propose an optimization model that dynamically allocates a total incentive budget to households to directly maximize the resultantcarbon emissions reduction– this is in contrast to prior work, which focuses on metrics such as the number of new installations. We leverage techniques from the multi-armed bandits problem to estimatehuman factors, such as a household’s willingness to adopt new technologies given a certain incentive. We apply our proposed dynamic incentive framework to a city in the Northeast U.S., using real household energy data, grid carbon intensity data, and future price scenarios. We compare our learning-based technique to two baselines, one “status-quo” baseline using incentives offered by a state and utility, and one simple heuristic baseline. With these baselines, we show that our learning-based technique significantly outperforms both the status-quo baseline and the heuristic baseline, achieving up to 37.88% higher carbon reductions than the status-quo baseline and up to 28.76% higher carbon reductions compared to the heuristic baseline. Additionally, our incentive allocation approach is able to achieve significant carbon reduction even in a broad set of environments, with varying values for electricity and gas prices, and for carbon intensity of the grid. Finally, we show that our framework can accommodateequity-awareconstraints to preserve an equitable allocation of incentives across socioeconomic groups while achieving 83.34% of the carbon reductions of the optimal solution on average. 

We introduce and study spatiotemporal online allocation with deadline constraints (SOAD), a new online problem motivated by emerging challenges in sustainability and energy. In SOAD, an online player completes a workload by allocating and scheduling it on the points of a metric space (X,d) while subject to a deadlineT. At each time step, a service cost function is revealed that represents the cost of servicing the workload at each point, and the player must irrevocably decide the current allocation of work to points. Whenever the player moves this allocation, they incur a movement cost defined by the distance metricd(⋅, ⋅) that captures, e.g., an overhead cost. SOAD formalizes the open problem of combining general metrics and deadline constraints in the online algorithms literature, unifying problems such as metrical task systems and online search. We propose a competitive algorithm for SOAD along with a matching lower bound establishing its optimality. Our main algorithm, ST-CLIP, is a learning-augmented algorithm that takes advantage of predictions (e.g., forecasts of relevant costs) and achieves an optimal consistency-robustness trade-off. We evaluate our proposed algorithms in a simulated case study of carbon-aware spatiotemporal workload management, an application in sustainable computing that schedules a delay-tolerant batch compute job on a distributed network of data centers. In these experiments, we show that ST-CLIP substantially improves on heuristic baseline methods. 

As computing demand continues to grow, minimizing its environmental impact has become crucial. This paper presents a study on carbon-aware scheduling algorithms, focusing on reducing carbon emissions of delay-tolerant batch workloads. Inspired by the Follow the Leader strategy, we introduce a simple yet efficient meta-algorithm, called FTL, that dynamically selects the most efficient scheduling algorithm based on real-time data and historical performance. Without fine-tuning and parameter optimization, FTL adapts to variability in job lengths, carbon intensity forecasts, and regional energy characteristics, consistently outperforming traditional carbon-aware scheduling algorithms. Through extensive experiments using real-world data traces, FTL achieves 8.2% and 14% improvement in average carbon footprint reduction over the closest runner-up algorithm and the carbon-agnostic algorithm, respectively, demonstrating its efficacy in minimizing carbon emissions across multiple geographical regions.¹ 

The rapid increase in computing demand and corresponding energy consumption have focused attention on computing's impact on the climate and sustainability. Prior work proposes metrics that quantify computing's carbon footprint across several lifecycle phases, including its supply chain, operation, and end-of-life. Industry uses these metrics to optimize the carbon footprint of manufacturing hardware and running computing applications. Unfortunately, prior work on optimizing datacenters' carbon footprint often succumbs to the sunk cost fallacy by considering embodied carbon emissions (a sunk cost) when making operational decisions (i.e., job scheduling and placement), which leads to operational decisions that do not always reduce the total carbon footprint. In this paper, we evaluate carbon-aware job scheduling and placement on a given set of servers for several carbon accounting metrics. Our analysis reveals state-of-the-art carbon accounting metrics that include embodied carbon emissions when making operational decisions can increase the total carbon footprint of executing a set of jobs. We study the factors that affect the added carbon cost of such suboptimal decision-making. We then use a real-world case study from a datacenter to demonstrate how the sunk carbon fallacy manifests itself in practice. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings in better guiding effective carbon-aware scheduling in on-premise and cloud datacenters. 

The impact of mobility decisions not only shapes urban traffic patterns and planning, but also its associated effects, such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although e-bike sharing is not a new concept, it has shown significant strides in technological progress in recent years due to the ongoing process of digitalization, specifically towards decarbonization effects. Past studies have shown that e-bike sharing shows a potential as a fast, mobile, and environmentally friendly alternative to cars and public transport. Although e-bikes represent a viable alternative to traditional means of transportation, there is a lack of quantification in understanding the impact and acceptance of e-bikes towards social contexts as well as its adoption as a type of sharing concept. In this paper, we employ the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model as an analytical framework to discern the use and acceptance of e-bike sharing as an emerging technological concept across different cities and social contexts. Our findings reveal that the e-bike sharing system's utilization is skewed towards a small percentage of "frequent users", and overall usage is biased towards younger, more-educated, and higher-income populations who live in bike-friendly areas. Our work contributes to the feasibility of embedding the e-bike sharing concept in the scope of the energy transition.