Search for: All records

We introduce and study spatiotemporal online allocation with deadline constraints (SOAD), a new online problem motivated by emerging challenges in sustainability and energy. In SOAD, an online player completes a workload by allocating and scheduling it on the points of a metric space (X,d) while subject to a deadlineT. At each time step, a service cost function is revealed that represents the cost of servicing the workload at each point, and the player must irrevocably decide the current allocation of work to points. Whenever the player moves this allocation, they incur a movement cost defined by the distance metricd(⋅, ⋅) that captures, e.g., an overhead cost. SOAD formalizes the open problem of combining general metrics and deadline constraints in the online algorithms literature, unifying problems such as metrical task systems and online search. We propose a competitive algorithm for SOAD along with a matching lower bound establishing its optimality. Our main algorithm, ST-CLIP, is a learning-augmented algorithm that takes advantage of predictions (e.g., forecasts of relevant costs) and achieves an optimal consistency-robustness trade-off. We evaluate our proposed algorithms in a simulated case study of carbon-aware spatiotemporal workload management, an application in sustainable computing that schedules a delay-tolerant batch compute job on a distributed network of data centers. In these experiments, we show that ST-CLIP substantially improves on heuristic baseline methods. 

As computing demand continues to grow, minimizing its environmental impact has become crucial. This paper presents a study on carbon-aware scheduling algorithms, focusing on reducing carbon emissions of delay-tolerant batch workloads. Inspired by the Follow the Leader strategy, we introduce a simple yet efficient meta-algorithm, called FTL, that dynamically selects the most efficient scheduling algorithm based on real-time data and historical performance. Without fine-tuning and parameter optimization, FTL adapts to variability in job lengths, carbon intensity forecasts, and regional energy characteristics, consistently outperforming traditional carbon-aware scheduling algorithms. Through extensive experiments using real-world data traces, FTL achieves 8.2% and 14% improvement in average carbon footprint reduction over the closest runner-up algorithm and the carbon-agnostic algorithm, respectively, demonstrating its efficacy in minimizing carbon emissions across multiple geographical regions.¹ 

The rapid increase in computing demand and corresponding energy consumption have focused attention on computing's impact on the climate and sustainability. Prior work proposes metrics that quantify computing's carbon footprint across several lifecycle phases, including its supply chain, operation, and end-of-life. Industry uses these metrics to optimize the carbon footprint of manufacturing hardware and running computing applications. Unfortunately, prior work on optimizing datacenters' carbon footprint often succumbs to the sunk cost fallacy by considering embodied carbon emissions (a sunk cost) when making operational decisions (i.e., job scheduling and placement), which leads to operational decisions that do not always reduce the total carbon footprint. In this paper, we evaluate carbon-aware job scheduling and placement on a given set of servers for several carbon accounting metrics. Our analysis reveals state-of-the-art carbon accounting metrics that include embodied carbon emissions when making operational decisions can increase the total carbon footprint of executing a set of jobs. We study the factors that affect the added carbon cost of such suboptimal decision-making. We then use a real-world case study from a datacenter to demonstrate how the sunk carbon fallacy manifests itself in practice. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings in better guiding effective carbon-aware scheduling in on-premise and cloud datacenters. 

The impact of mobility decisions not only shapes urban traffic patterns and planning, but also its associated effects, such as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Although e-bike sharing is not a new concept, it has shown significant strides in technological progress in recent years due to the ongoing process of digitalization, specifically towards decarbonization effects. Past studies have shown that e-bike sharing shows a potential as a fast, mobile, and environmentally friendly alternative to cars and public transport. Although e-bikes represent a viable alternative to traditional means of transportation, there is a lack of quantification in understanding the impact and acceptance of e-bikes towards social contexts as well as its adoption as a type of sharing concept. In this paper, we employ the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model as an analytical framework to discern the use and acceptance of e-bike sharing as an emerging technological concept across different cities and social contexts. Our findings reveal that the e-bike sharing system's utilization is skewed towards a small percentage of "frequent users", and overall usage is biased towards younger, more-educated, and higher-income populations who live in bike-friendly areas. Our work contributes to the feasibility of embedding the e-bike sharing concept in the scope of the energy transition.